* Includes : Individuals , Families. Medical & Veterinary Professionals
Australia's largest on & off-line Network providing
( Non-Legal ) Legal Counsel / Consult & CONFLICT RESOLUTION
for : Advice Seekers & Providers
Learn More
"BUILT ON STRENGTH GUIDED BY VISION"
( click above image for ICOCR /Global services )
E-Court℠ ( view AU OrganoGram) provides Mediation Services in all Australian States
under global "service" tradenames/marks :E-COURT℠ , E-COUNSEL℠ and E-CONSULT℠
Legal Opinion via
E-COUNSEL℠ and E-CONSULT℠
So, what are the advantages to E-COURT℠ mediation over pursuing a dispute through traditional channels? The advantages can sometimes vary from dispute to dispute, but essentially the advantages over traditional channels can be summarized as follows : With E-Counsel℠......
(1) The process can be tailored to suit parties particular needs
(2) Judges are chosen for their expertise and have been thoroughly vetted
(3) It is confidential : Unlike a traditional trial, LEGAL OPINION with e-Court is essentially a private procedure, so that if the parties desire privacy then the dispute and the resolution can be kept confidential
(4) The process is quicker, no more than 6 weeks and considerably cheaper than the traditional court.
Further info click below links :
All matters discussed during an E-Counsel℠ legal opinion process are entirely confidential. The parties to the process, including the practitioner, will sign an agreement that binds all of them to this concept of confidentiality. Nothing that has been discussed by anyone can be repeated without the express consent of all involved. Further, nothing that has been discussed in an E-Counsel℠ legal opinion process can be shared with a traditional court or other forum without the express consent of all involved.
E-Counsel℠'s interpretation of Legal Opinion versus Legal Advice ( Note different jurisdictions may have different interpretations ) : If what you are seeking is an analysis of the legal effect of past events or documents, for example, if you want to determine who owns a parcel of land, you need a 'legal opinion'.
Likewise, if an attorney/judge offers a 'legal opinion' but what you seek is future guidance, or the attorney/judge offers 'legal advice' when you want an analysis of past events, you should communicate this to the attorney to ensure that you receive the type of legal services you need.
Summary : Legal Advice applies the law, including statute and case law and legal principles to a particular situation. It provides recommendations about what course of action would best suit the facts of the case and what the party wants to achieve. A legal opinion letter offers significantly less extensive information than legal advice, which requires more in-depth analysis. Consequently, one should not rely solely on a legal opinion letter and should instead seek out more extensive legal advice from an attorney/judge.Note: E-Counsel℠ does not offer legal advice, however a legal opinion may often be used by conflicting parties to 'test' the waters prior to seek LEGAL OPINION.
Anyone who has been through the process of bringing a case to a traditional court, or being sued, often feels aggrieved at the costs of doing so. Rarely are lawyers praised for being good value for money. Naturally, each E-Counsel℠ practitioner will have their own way of charging for each situation. But generally the E-Counsel℠ legal opinion cost is fixed at the outset and often this cost is shared between the parties equally. At no time can costs charged by the E-Counsel℠ practitioner be more than 60% of the regular fees charged. There will be no extra costs at the end, in fact all costs including the small E-Counsel℠ overhead charge are being paid before the process begins in an entirely transparent way so that there will be no surprises. Furthermore it is a comfort to know that there will be strict E-Counsel℠ rules to ensure all monies paid will end up in an escrow run by a third party bank or other recognized reliable organization. On some occasions one party will agree to pay all the costs involved, for example when an employment dispute is the subject of mediation or LEGAL OPINION the employer often pays for the mediation. Requesting a legal opinion via E-Counsel℠ is always a cheaper process than litigating a dispute through either E-Counsel℠ and a traditional court.
.
When writing the opinion letter, the E-Counsel℠ practitioner clarifies all the areas of concern. Most of the time, member clients approach the practitioner with an unclear question. So, when drafting the questions, they need to be made more sensible. E-Counsel℠'s practitioners ensure that questions are phrased in a way that communicates the clients issues but in a more clear and understandable way such as :
1. Stating the facts: The facts are the answers to the clients questions. The facts should answer the questions with a yes or no. Any fact that has not been supplied are not be included in the narration. However, any natural interface or presumption concluded from the facts, including the interface or presumptions are the E-Counsel℠ practitioners personal opinions and are as such included. In addition all the documents that the member clients provide are for the sake of drafting the legal opinion.
2. Analysis: For an easy analysis, the E-Counsel℠ practitioner first sets out the provision of the law and the law itself. After that, the jurisdiction of the High Court or the Supreme Court over the issue at hand is summarized including all the extracts are cited. For an ultimate opinion, precise extracts on which to base E-Counsel℠ practitioners judgment is chosen. The analysis includes conditions necessary for a positive or negative answer. At this point, member clients are informed where they stand in regards to the law applicable. To simplify the analysis process, all previous paragraphs are numbered to relieve the burden of repeating previously written information.
3. Answer the query: To answer the query, the E-Counsel℠ practitioner will rely on the fact and analysis sections. When monosyllabic answers such as either yes or no cannot apply, answers are kept short and to the point.
4. Usual disclaimers: Under the disclaimer, E-Counsel℠ always state that the opinions provided are based on the law as per the time of drafting the opinion. Moreover, E-Counsel℠ indicates that the opinion is also based on the documents and facts provided.
Our Mission statement:
e-Court PeaceKeeper aims to be a champion for the consumer, achieving this by offering passionate and visionary values. These are: Value for Money: To offer honest, simple, and transparent pricing. Quality of Service: To offer services without compromising any of e-Court's values. Specifically to be professional and with unquestionable integrity. For the People: To offer conflict resolution services for everyone, not just those who can afford it. Challenging: To offer new and innovative ideas, to always push the boundaries of conventional thinking. Force for Good: e-Court would like to see itself as making a positive contribution to peoples lives and as a force for good. We will achieve these goals by : view what sets us apart
(click image)
e-Court / Peacekeeper and subsidiaries comply fully with the EU General Data Protection Regulation
Ready to join the E-COUNSEL℠ and E-CONSULT℠ family ?
and ... seek conflict resolution with prior knowledge of costs & duration and perhaps best of all interactive and in real time ? Then sign up for the NO-CHARGE Temporary membership via the venue for those who seek help to solve their conflicts. Please click on the following link :
First-Choice Legal Opinion Practitioners Roster
Click Image- Sample
As of today in excess of #15,000 Legal Opinion Practitioners throughout Australia are ready to serve you.
Members can use the following search box to locate a professional firm specializing in a particular area, in a particular AU State. This specialized search is both powerful and
comprehensive, because it searches multiple E-Counsel℠ State directories and thousands of first-choice member firm web sites in a fraction of a second. Membership is a prerequisite.
© 2010-2021 Powered by Int'l Court for Conflict Resolution. | Secured - 256 bit SSL.